Legal Opinion
Portofino Professional Center v. Prime Homes
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 5, 2014No. 3D13-523PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLogue, J.
Portofino Professional Center Condominium Association, Inc. (“the Association”) challenges an order granting a motion to strike its untimely filed amended complaint and an order denying its motion for an enlargement of time to file that complaint. Because the practical effect of these two orders is to dismiss appellant’s complaint with prejudice, and because the trial court entered the orders without considering the factors set forth by the Florida Supreme Court in Kozel v. Ostendorf, 629 So.2d 817 (Fla.1993), we reverse.
On February 8, 2012, the Association sued Prime Homes at Portofino…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kozel v. OstendorfSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Ham v. DunmireSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Alsina v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Delgado v. J. Byrons, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Arkiteknic, Inc. v. United Glass Laminating, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Federal National Mortgage Association v. LinnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Nguyen, Nguyen v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
- THE FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF GREATER MIAMI v. MIAMI BAPTIST ASSOCIATION, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. WhyteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Wells Fargo National Bank, National Association v. Gerald A. AnishDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016