Legal Opinion

Ray Heating Products, Inc. v. Miller

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1958No. 4044PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Eather, J.:

The district court dismissed appellant’s lien foreclosure complaint on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a claim. Respondents seek to sustain this ruling upon the sole ground “that appellant’s claim and statement of mechanic’s lien was fatally defective in that it did not set forth a sufficient statement of the claimant’s demand after deducting all just credits and offsets and a statement of the terms, time given and conditions of the contract.”

The statute requires the recording of “a claim containing a statement of his demand after…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lonkey v. WellsNevada Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Warren v. QuadeWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Milner v. ShueyNevada Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Porteous Decorative Co. v. FeeNevada Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Twin Island Development Corp. v. WinchesterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  2. Close v. Isbell Construction Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Schofield v. Copeland Lumber Yards, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Crofoot v. HillNevada Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Martin v. SternerNevada Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API