Ray Heating Products, Inc. v. Miller
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Eather, J.:
The district court dismissed appellant’s lien foreclosure complaint on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a claim. Respondents seek to sustain this ruling upon the sole ground “that appellant’s claim and statement of mechanic’s lien was fatally defective in that it did not set forth a sufficient statement of the claimant’s demand after deducting all just credits and offsets and a statement of the terms, time given and conditions of the contract.”
The statute requires the recording of “a claim containing a statement of his demand after…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lonkey v. WellsNevada Supreme Court · 1881
- Warren v. QuadeWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Milner v. ShueyNevada Supreme Court · 1936
- Porteous Decorative Co. v. FeeNevada Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by5 opinions
- Twin Island Development Corp. v. WinchesterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Close v. Isbell Construction Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Schofield v. Copeland Lumber Yards, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1985
- Crofoot v. HillNevada Supreme Court · 1958
- Martin v. SternerNevada Supreme Court · 1959