Legal Opinion

Filippe A. Broadbent Mantel Co. v. Mayor of Baltimore

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 3, 1919PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. (Heuisler, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPattison, J.

Section 7 of Ordinance 140, passed by the Mayor and City Council of .Baltimore, approved on July 6th, 1912, provides that:

“The Appeal Tax Court is authorized and directed upon the application, as hereinafter provided, of any individual, firm or corporation, actually engaged in the business of manufacturing articles of commerce in the City of Baltimore, to abate any and all personal taxes which may be levied hereafter by authority of the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore for any of the corporate uses thereof, upon any mechanical tools or implements, whether worked by hand or by steam, or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sindall v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  2. County of Hennepin v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. United Railways & Electric Co. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  4. State ex rel. Ward v. Board of AssessorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pittman v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  2. Bistline v. BassettIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Readlyn Hospital v. HothSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  4. H. M. Rowe Co. v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  5. Clarke v. Union Trust Co. of D.C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API