Legal Opinion

United States v. Giger

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided February 21, 1939No. 2101PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAGON, District Judge.

On February 16, 1931, S. A. Smith procured a Federal loan from The Secretary of Agriculture and executed therefor his promissory note secured by a Federal Crop Mortgage in favor of The Secretary of Agriculture on all crops growing upon his farm in Benton County. The note originally was for $225; and on June 22, 1932, the mortgage was renewed on the balance of $160 for a period covering up to November 30, 1932. S. A. Smith died in 1934 and Roy Giger was appointed administrator of his estate and qualified as such, executing a bond as such administrator in the sum of $4000.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bramwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. United States v. Butterworth-Judson Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Hall v. BrewerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
  4. Planters' Mutual Insurance v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. Statham v. BrookeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Leo LutzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  2. Burnett Schwartz and Estate of Max L. Raskin, Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API