Legal Opinion
Honeywell International, Inc. v. Universal Avionics Systems Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 12, 2004No. 02-359-MPTPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Nature and Stage of the Proceedings
This action, which originated as a patent infringement case, involves technology in the aviation industry. The parties are competitors in the market for terrain warning systems and displays. Honeywell International Inc. 1 and Honeywell Intellectual Properties Inc. 2 (collectively, “Honeywell”) 3 manufacture and sell a terrain awareness and warning system, the “Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System” or “EGPWS.” Since February 29, 2000, Universal Avionics Systems Corp. (“Universal”) 4 manufactures and sells…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Honeywell International Inc. v. Universal Avionics Systems Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Teamsters Local 814 Welfare Fund v. Dahill Moving & Storage Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Cordance Corp. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Honeywell International, Inc. v. Universal Avionics Systems Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2005
- Hasbro, Inc. v. AmronDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.