Legal Opinion

Adams v. Alabama Lime Stone Corporation

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 31, 1932No. 6 Div. 962PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The action is libel. Though only partially exhibited in the complaint;, it appears that the language of which complaint is here made consisted of averments in a bill of complaint filed in equity by defendant to this cause against the present plaintiff, and, while the purpose of the bill is not stated in the present complaint, and the prayer for relief is omitted as a part of the exhibit, yet it is reasonably inferable from the averments that are exhibited that they are appropriate and relevant in any equity proceeding, wherein an equitable set-off is sought to-be established.

Based upon the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. White v. NichollsSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. Nalle v. OysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Runge v. FranklinTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Moore v. Manufacturers' National Bank of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Lawson v. HicksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1862

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. O'BARR v. FeistSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. Walker v. MajorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Drees v. TurnerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  4. Morrison v. Mobile County Bd. of Educ.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Drees v. TurnerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API