Legal Opinion

Hooker v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided October 23, 1996No. 09-95-182 CRPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALKER, Chief Justice.

A jury convicted appellant of having committed the felony offense of Driving While Intoxicated — Subsequent Offense. The jury then assessed punishment at confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice— Institutional Division for a term of fifteen (15) months, and fined appellant $2,000. The jury recommended that appellant’s sentence be probated as to the fine only, for a term of five (5) years. Appellant raises two points of error for our consideration. Each point of error has a number of subpoints some of which require separate analysis and disposition.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Nickerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Abron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Esparza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
  2. Jesus Corrdero Romero v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  3. Aguirre v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  4. McClain v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  5. Texas Department of Public Safety v. Rodriguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API