Hooker v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALKER, Chief Justice.
A jury convicted appellant of having committed the felony offense of Driving While Intoxicated — Subsequent Offense. The jury then assessed punishment at confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice— Institutional Division for a term of fifteen (15) months, and fined appellant $2,000. The jury recommended that appellant’s sentence be probated as to the fine only, for a term of five (5) years. Appellant raises two points of error for our consideration. Each point of error has a number of subpoints some of which require separate analysis and disposition.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Nickerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Abron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Esparza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
- Jesus Corrdero Romero v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
- Aguirre v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
- McClain v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. Rodriguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.