Dick v. Marx & Rawolle, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Chief Justice.
This is ,an appeal by the defendants below from a judgment entered against them by the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia under the seventy-third rule of practice in that court. Under that rule, in actions arising ex contractu, if the plaintiff shall have filed, at the time of bringing his action, an affidavit setting out distinctly his cause of action and the sum he claims to be due, exclusive of all set-offs and just grounds of defense, and shall have served the defendant with copies of the declaration and affidavit, he shall be entitled to a judgment for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Silliman v. United States. United States v. SillimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- French v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
3Cited by9 opinions
- W. R. Grimshaw Company and National Surety Corporation v. Nevil C. Withrow Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- In Re Prima Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- Jackson v. FullerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Rizzi v. FanelliDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. KeigCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.