Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Fuller
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 31, 1936No. 6656PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Associate Justice,
This is an appeal from a decree of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia1 dismissing, upon the ground that no cause of action was stated therein, an amended bill of complaint in equity. The general purpose of the bill was to set aside a foreclosure sale of real property. Other incidental relief was prayed for.
The complaint is lacking in brevity and clarity. We endeavor below, except where we quote, to state its allegations, seriatim, in substance and effect, with Such elimination of redundancy as is consistent with fair reflection of apparent intended…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Anderson v. WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1894
- Dick v. Marx & Rawolle, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
- Ryan v. Security Savings & Commercial BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
- Smith v. PickfordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Golden v. TomiyasuNevada Supreme Court · 1963
- National Life Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Jerome Silverman, Carroll Arms Associates, a District of Columbia Limited Partnership v. National Life Insurance Company, a Vermont Corporation, A/K/A National Life of VermontCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- S & G Investment Inc. v. Home Federal Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- National Life Insurance v. SilvermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Rothenberg v. Ralph D. Kaiser Co. (In Re Rothenberg)District Court, District of Columbia · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.