Legal Opinion

Olson v. Bolstad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 16, 1925No. 24,110PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

This action for malpractice was dismissed at the close of plaintiff’s case on the ground that the evidence faffed to show negligence on the part of the defendant. Plaintiff appealed from an order denying a new trial.

Defendant, a practicing physician, attended plaintiff in childbirth at her home. The child was safely delivered and he left. Some three hours later plaintiff, who was being cared for by Mrs. Frost, a licensed midwife, and by her mother and her husband, went into convulsions and defendant was again called. On seeing her condition, he said:

“Get all the hot water bottles…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Malkowski v. GrahamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Dalsgaard v. MeierdingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wright v. ConwayWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Hallinan v. PrindleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Hohenthal v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  4. Porter v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Swigerd v. City of OrtonvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API