Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Wilkins

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 28, 1980No. 21243PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from an order denying appellant Chilton M. Wilkins’ motion that the trial judge disqualify himself from further participation in these proceedings. We affirm.

The denial of a motion that the presiding judge disqualify is, in the absence of statutory provision to the contrary, generally treated as an interlocutory decision not directly appealable. See 4 Am. Jur. (2d) Appeal and Error, § 88, 46 Am. Jur. (2d) Judges, § 222. This Court has never met the issue of the- appealability of such an order.

There is no statutory remedy provided by our Code of Laws for the direct appeal of…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Matthews v. EvattCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  2. Matthews v. EvattCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  3. Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. People v. LowensteinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Ellis v. PROCTER AND GAMBLE DISTRIBUTING COMPANYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API