Dickinson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
In this condemnation case judgment was entered for the landowner upon the jury’s verdict for $7,000 and an appeal was taken because of errors said to have been committed by the District Court in a ruling on the evidence and in refusing a motion for a new trial based on the ground of newly discovered evidence. A witness for the landowner testified that the value of the property when taken by the United States in 1943 was approximately $14,000. On cross examination it was brought out that the witness himself had previously owned the property and had sold it in 1937; but he could not remember…
2Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. 5139.5 Acres of Land, in Aiken and Barnwell Counties, S. C., Tract No. D-308Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
- Hickey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- United States v. HamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- H. & H. Supply Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Staninger v. Jacksonville Expressway AuthorityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.