Legal Opinion
R.B. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 17, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Associate Judge:
The Office of Administrative Hearings (“OAH”) found that petitioner R.B.1 was ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits because he was terminated from his job with respondent United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) for conduct that constituted “gross misconduct.” 2 R.B. asserts that, in contravention of the unemployment compensation regulations, the OAH administrative law judge (“ALJ”) improperly based her decision on “prior statements or written documents” without “other reliable corroborating evidence,” Petitioner’s Brief at 2 (quoting 7 DCMR…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jadallah v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Washington Times v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Odeniran v. Hanley Wood, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Washington Post v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- McKinley v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rb v. UsepaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011