Legal Opinion

Steerman v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 17, 1984No. C-84-1036 RFPPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PECKHAM, Chief Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Steerman, a prisoner, has filed a petition for habeas corpus. For the reasons stated below, his petition is denied.

*763FACTS

In 1980, plaintiff Steerman was charged with three counts of mail fraud and one count of malicious destruction of a building. The court dismissed the latter count on motion of the government, but a jury-found plaintiff guilty of the mail fraud counts.

In plaintiff’s presentence report, the government explained that the mail frauds occurred when plaintiff collected insurance proceeds following a 1977 fire that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Arias, Rene v. The United States Parole Commission Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Lewisburg, Pa.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. Willis E. Campbell v. United States Parole Commission and Joseph S. Petrovsky. Appeal of United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. Felix M. Page v. United States Parole Commission, John W. Allman, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Ernest W. Shahid, Jr. v. Curtis C. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. MeeseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  2. Thomas Clayton Tobias v. U.S. Parole Commission and P.W. Keohane, Warden, Fci, MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API