Legal Opinion
Neese v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided August 28, 1996No. 09-95-101 CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STOVER, Justice.
Appellant, Michael Neese, appeals from a conviction for possession of a controlled substance, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), in an amount greater than four (4) but less than 200 grams. Subsequent to Neese’s guilty plea, which was made in accordance with a plea bargain, the trial court sentenced him to twenty years’ confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. We reverse and remand the judgment of the trial court.
Facts
At approximately 11 a.m. on October 20, 1994, Officer Murphy of the Lufkin Police Department received a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- St. George v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- McBath v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
- Miller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
- Carmouche v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Brenes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.