Legal Opinion

Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. Fowlkes

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 2013No. 2013-JP-00743-SCTPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. The Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance (the “Commission”) filed a formal complaint against Municipal Court Judge Robert Earl Fowlkes regarding a verbal altercation he had with a probation officer outside the courtroom. The Commission and Judge Fowlkes have filed a joint motion asking the Court to approve agreed-upon sanctions of a public *906reprimand and costs of $200. We agree that Judge Fowlkes should be publicly reprimanded and assessed $200 for the costs of proceedings, and we find that he also should be fined $1,000.

Facts and Procedural History

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miss. Com'n on Jud. Performance v. GibsonMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  2. COM'N ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE v. SanfordMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In Re AndersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. BooneMississippi Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Miss. Com'n on Jud. Performance v. BrittonMississippi Supreme Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. ShoemakeMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. Carlos E. Moore, Municipal Court JudgeMississippi Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. County Court Judge Mark H. WattsMississippi Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. Municipal Court Judge Carlos E. MooreMississippi Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. ShoemakeMississippi Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API