Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. Shoemake

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 2016No. 2015-JP-00996-SCTPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKing, Justice

¶ 54. Today the majority finds that Chancellor David Shoemake’s negligence and inattention resulted in the dissipation of assets' from Victoria Newsome’s estate. The majority fines Chancellor Shoemake $2,500 and suspends 'him from office for a period of thirty days without pay. Yet the majority does not account for the fact that Chancellor Shoemake’s negligence and inattention cost Victoria Newsome, an incapacitated 'Ward of the court, at least $23,000 that she is unable to recuperate. Becaus'e I believe that Chancellor Shoemake should be required to make Victoria’s estate whole in addition…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. BooneMississippi Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Mississippi State Bar Ass'n v. MoyoMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  3. MISS. COM'N ON JUD. PERFORMANCE v. GordonMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In Re BrananMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Carpenter v. BerryMississippi Supreme Court · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API