Norman Gaudette v. Terry M. Davis
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1DissentJabar, J.
[¶ 26] I respectfully dissent because the new procedures that the Court establishes defeat the purpose of the legislation, create unconstitutional impediments to potentially meritorious causes of action, and place an undue burden upon litigants in derogation of established common law by screening what would otherwise be meritorious cases.
[¶ 27] Almost five years ago, we held that when a party makes a special motion to dismiss pursuant to 14 M.R.S. § 556 (2016), the nonmoving party must make a prima facie showing that any of the petitioning activities by the moving parties were devoid of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- BE&K Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Duracraft Corp. v. Holmes Products Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.