Legal Opinion
Mark D. v. Municipal Boundary Commission
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided September 13, 1995No. 16053PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLACK, Judge.
Petitioners’ Motion for Rehearing is denied. The opinion filed August 25, 1995 is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor.
The City of Sunland Park (City) is a New Mexico municipal corporation. Pursuant to the annexation procedure provided in NMSA 1978, Sections 3-7-11 to -16 (Repl. Pamp.1987), the City filed an annexation petition seeking approval by the Municipal Boundary Commission (Commission) to annex physically contiguous territory along its main street. The Commission held hearings and determined that, with the exception of one residential area, the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Whitely v. New Mexico State Personnel BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Mutz v. Municipal Boundary CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Dugger v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- Martinez v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Department, Motor Vehicle DivisionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- City of Sunland Park v. Santa Teresa Concerned Citizens Ass'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
3Cited by14 opinions
- Quantum Corp. v. State Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Atlixco Coalition v. MaggioreNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Blackwood & Nichols Co. v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- New Mexico Department of Labor v. A.C. Electric, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- TPL, Inc. v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.