Hedges v. State

Appellant was charged by affidavit, tried and convicted in the court below of violating §1, Acts 1921 p. 736, §8356d Burns’ Supp. 1921, amending §4, Acts 1917 p. 15. His motion for a new trial was over*124ruled, and judgment rendered on the verdict of guilty. The action of the court in overruling his motion for a new trial is the only error assigned.

Appellant sought a new trial, alleging insufficient evidence'to support the verdict and that the verdict was contrary to law; also that the court erred irt giving instructions Nos. 5 and 6 upon its own motion.

The affidavit, in so far as the same is…