Legal Opinion

Ketchum v. Parker

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided February 22, 2008No. CIV-07-1112-CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ROBIN J. CAUTHRON, District Judge.

This 28 U.S.C. § 2254 action for habeas corpus relief, brought by a state prisoner proceeding pro se, was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Bana Roberts, consistent with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Roberts entered a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) on January 30, 2008, recommending the Petition be dismissed as untimely. Petitioner filed a timely objection, 1 and the Court therefore considers the matter de novo.

The Magistrate Judge properly-raised, sua sponte, the timing of Petitioner’s…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. House v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Dennis Wayne Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. MartinDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2020
  2. Hopkins v. MartinDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2020
  3. Ray v. QuickDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2024
  4. Seals v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API