United States v. Stanley Ward
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
This pro se § 2255 motion represents the second time the Appellant Ward has sought post conviction relief from his 1971 conviction in the Northern District of Georgia for conveying within the Atlanta penitentiary a destructive device designed to kill, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1792. 1
The first § 2255 motion raised the issues of racial composition of the grand and petit juries involved in Ward’s prosecution and trial. With respect to the grand jury question, the District Court’s denial of relief was based on Ward’s failure to raise the issue by a motion before trial in accordance with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. John Arthur DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Michael Waldo Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Thomas Darrell Camp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Harold Raymond Hooks v. R. v. Roberts, Warden, Hillsborough County Convict CampCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. DanglerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Henry Willis, III v. Walter B. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Charles Ray Braxton, Tdc 243157 v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. DavisDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996