Pierce v. Sun Insurance Office
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, first district, rendered in favor of the defendant after a trial before the court and a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtPendleton, J.
The action was brought on an insurance policy against fire for the loss of rental during the time necessary to rebuild. The complaint, after the allegation as to the issuing of the policy, the fire and destruction of the property, alleged that the loss was $250, and that plaintiff had performed all the conditions on his part to be performed,' and that sixty days had elapsed after notice and proof of loss. The answer denied that plaintiff had performed the conditions on his part to be performed and alleged, after setting forth the provisions of the policy, that defendant; had notified…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Uhrig v. . Williamsburgh City Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Bishop v. Agricultural InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Bradshaw v. Agricultural Insurance of WatertownNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Meyerson v. Hartford Fire InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pierce v. Sun Insurance OfficeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915