Legal Opinion

Meyerson v. Hartford Fire Insurance

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 15, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

■ Appeal by defendant from- an affirmance by the City Court, General Term, of a judgment in favor of plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The action is upon a policy of insurance- issued by the defendant to Amelia Schwartz, to recover the amount of a loss by fire which took place March 5, 1895,. in premises No. 69 West Third'street, this city. The policy was for one year from November 13, 1894, and covered household furniture, wearing apparel, etc. " -

The questions presented for review are based on a condition of the policy providing that “ In the event of disagreement -as to the. amount of loss, the same shall * * . * be ascertained by two competent and disinterested appraisers, the assured and this company each selecting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Turner v. . KouwenhovenNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Uhrig v. . Williamsburgh City Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Fenlon v. DempseyNew York Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. National Fire Insurance v. O'BryanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. American Union Ins. Co. v. Stull Bros. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  3. Pierce v. Sun Insurance OfficeAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914
  4. Estate of McCampbell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API