Legal Opinion
Dominguez v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 1, 2000PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruno, J.), dated January 6, 1999, which denied the application.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the petitioner’s application for leave to serve a late notice of claim, as the petitioner did not provide any reasonable excuse for failing to serve a timely notice of claim (see, General *327Municipal Law § 50-e [1] [a]; [5]; Matter of Dube v City of New…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Caselli v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Deegan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Dube v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Dancy v. Poughkeepsie Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Olivera v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gillum v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Yearusskaya v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Matter of Clark v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Farfan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Acosta v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.