Legal Opinion
Yearusskaya v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 22, 2001PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated December 10, 1999, which denied the application.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the petitioner’s application for leave to serve a late notice of claim, as the petitioner did not provide any reasonable excuse for failing to serve a timely notice of claim (see, General Municipal Law § 50-e [1] [a]; [5]). The petitioner…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Deegan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Figueroa v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Dominguez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Doherty v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lorseille v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Portnov v. City of Glen CoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Perre v. Town of PoughkeepsieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Clark v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Farfan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.