Legal Opinion
Carlsson v. Pennsylvania General Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 13, 1969No. Appeal, No. 61PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
This action of assumpsit was tried before a judge sitting without a jury. The court found for the defendant and this appeal followed. The court found the following facts.
William K. Unverzagt, a resident of Pittsburgh, owned a 1960 automobile. His son, William S. Unverzagt, was a student at Allegheny College in Meadville. The father had given the son permission to operate the automobile in the Pittsburgh area, and had affixed no restriction as to its operation there. He had, however, refused his son permission to take the car to Meadville. In spite of this express…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cadwallader v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Sperling v. Great American Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Conrad v. DuffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. MarshbankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Bowman v. Preferred Risk Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Zurich American InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Farmers Insurance v. U. S. F. & G. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- American Motorists Insurance Co. v. LaCourseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Government Employees Insurance v. KinyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.