Charles Ronald Brent v. Vennit B. Mathis, II
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Justice,
for the Court:
¶ 1. Following his divorce, Vennit Mathis, individually and as next friend of his two minor children, sued Dr. Charles Brent for tortious interference of a mar*844riage contract, alienation of affection, and reckless infliction of emotional distress. Dr. Brent moved for summary judgment on the children’s claims, but the trial coui't denied the motion. The Court granted Dr. Brent’s petition for interlocutory appeal.
Statement of the Facts
¶ 2. Vennit and Nicole Mathis married in October 2005; they had two children, Vennit B. Mathis III and Alexa Mathis. Vennit and…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Karpinsky v. American National Insurance Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2013
- Leaf River Forest Products, Inc. v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- Monsanto Co. v. HallMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
- Adams v. US Homecrafters, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- Buckel v. ChaneyMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Parker v. Miller (In re Miller)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2018
- Kenneth M. Crook v. City of Madison, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
- Wright ex rel. Wright v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2014
- Culumber v. Morris Network of Mississippi, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2025
- Green v. Amazon.com Services LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.