Wood v. Mayor of Millville
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which court the following per curiam opinion was filed: The writ of certiorari in-this case removes two resolutions passed by the defendant municipality.
Read the full summary
On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which court the following per curiam opinion was filed: The writ of certiorari in-this case removes two resolutions passed by the defendant municipality. One of the resolutions, intended to enable the city to take the necessary steps to install an electric light distributing plant, was passed under the authority contained in the act of 1911 (Pamph L., p. 690), which act after the granting of the writ in this case was declared invalid by this court. In re Jaegle, 54 Vroom 313. We are not called upon therefore to deal with that phase of the case. The other…
1Per curiam
We think the judgment of the Supreme Court should be affirmed, and are content to rest our decision respecting the first resolution upon what is said by the court below as to the effect of the decision. In re Jaegle, 54 Vroom 313. It is now argued that the Supreme Court should not have dismissed the writ but should have set aside the resolution in question on the authority of the Jaegle case. It might perhaps have done so, but would have then taken an unusual course, as the invalidity of the act of 1911 was not set up by any of the reasons filed, and for the adequate reason that the decision…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re JaegleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
3Cited by1 opinion
- Porskievies v. Borough of Atlantic HighlandsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935