Porskievies v. Borough of Atlantic Highlands
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Ctjkiam.
The writ in this case, tested December 8th, 1934, and probably allowed on that date, calls for a borough ordinance of September 11th, 1934, providing for repairs and improvements in the local sewage and water systems, and for a contract of the borough with defendant Fairbanks Morse Company pursuant thereto. Various defects, procedural and otherwise, are urged as reasons for setting aside the ordinance and contract, but we have not considered them because of what we deem the obvious laches of the prosecutor.
The ordinance passed first and second readings on August 29th, at a meeting…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carr v. Borough of MerchantvilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
- Carver v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- Duffy v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
- Wood v. Mayor of MillvilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
3Cited by2 opinions
- McMichael v. City of South AmboySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- Porskievies v. Borough of Atlantic HighlandsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935