Legal Opinion

Etzel v. Etzel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 20, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Seibert, Jr., J), entered August 3, 2004 in Saratoga County, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion to direct plaintiff to execute certain income tax forms permitting defendant to claim the parties’ children as dependants.

The parties, who married in 1981 and divorced in 1998, are *907the parents of nine children born between 1982 and 1993. During the divorce proceedings, they entered into an oral stipulation and opt-out agreement, the transcript of which was annexed to the judgment of divorce and the terms of which were incorporated but not merged…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Suffolk County Deptartment of Social Services v. James M.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Briarpatch Ltd, L.P. v. Frankfurt Garbus Klein & Selz, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Watrous v. WatrousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Ellenbogen v. EllenbogenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Cadejah AA.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Hejna v. ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Hunt v. BartleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API