Legal Opinion

Soott v. Pilipo

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1918No. 1052PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal From Circuit Judge, First Circuit. Hon. S. B. Kemp, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

QUARLES, J.

In a partition suit one of the plaintiffs presented a supplemental petition asking that the respondent C. K. Ai be made a party defendant and held to account for rents col*278lected by him as a cotenant for portions of the common property, whereupon an order requiring said Ai to appear and show cause why he should not be made a party defendant and held to account for rents collected by him was made; on hearing said order to- show cause was set aside and from the last named order an interlocutory appeal was granted to this court and on hearing of the same we…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barnum v. LandonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
  2. Du Rette v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Pilipo v. ScottHawaii Supreme Court · 1913
  4. In re Assessment of Taxes, Hui of KahanaHawaii Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Scott v. PilipoHawaii Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of AllenHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Marks v. Ah NeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Scott v. PilipoHawaii Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Ishida v. NaumuHawaii Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Foster v. Waiahole Water Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API