Legal Opinion

Olson v. Amundson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 29, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by defendants, Amund I. Amundson, as Sheriff of Chippewa County, McCormick Harvesting Machine Company, Lycurgus E. Moyer, and C. H. Budd, from an order of the District Court of Chippewa County, Powers, J., made February 24, 1892, refusing a new trial.

Read the full summary

Appeal by defendants, Amund I. Amundson, as Sheriff of Chippewa County, McCormick Harvesting Machine Company, Lycurgus E. Moyer, and C. H. Budd, from an order of the District Court of Chippewa County, Powers, J., made February 24, 1892, refusing a new trial. On June 28, 1884, The McCormick Harvesting Machine Company, recovered and docketed in Chippewa County a judgment against one Bord Olson, for $384.49. At that time, Olson owned the north half, and the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter, and the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter, of section 12, township 119, range 39, in…

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

The wheat in controversy was raised upon a farm the title of which was and for several years had been in plaintiff. This farm had formerly belonged to her husband, who had mortgaged it in two parcels for nearly its full value, and had allowed the mortgages to be foreclosed. With á little pecuniary assistance from a son, and with the aid of a person who procured an assignment of the foreclosure sale certificates, and also a loan upon the land for plaintiff, she was enabled to secure the fee title, and thereafter she carried on the place in her own name. There was really no evidence on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hossfeldt v. DillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  2. Hartman v. WeilandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. Erickson v. PatersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Sanders v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hoover v. CarverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API