Union Oil Company of California v. M/V Issaquena
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
ORMA R. SMITH, District Judge.
This admiralty action is before the court for decision after an evidentiary hearing and the submission by the parties of briefs and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. This memorandum will include findings of fact and conclusions of law by the court as required by Rule 52(a) F.R.Civ.P.
Plaintiff, Union Oil Company of California (Union Oil), is a California corporation and the owner and operator of the M/V L. W. SWEET and the steel tank Barges P. 0. 1901 and P. 0. 2006. These vessels are documented vessels of the United States.
At…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Clyde S. S. Co. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Petition of Canal Barge CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1971
- Navigazione Alta Italia v. Keystone Shipping CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Sportsmen's Enterprises, Inc. v. Union Barge Line Corp.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1969
3Cited by2 opinions
- Union Oil Company Of California v. The M/V IssaquenaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Union Oil Co. v. The M/V IssaquenaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973