Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 24, 1982No. 21707PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Following a conviction for voluntary manslaughter, the appellant was sentenced to twenty-four years’ imprisonment.

The record in this case is over three hundred pages long. We have determined that less than thirty percent of the included material is relevant to the exceptions or additional sustaining grounds before us. The record grossly offends Rule 4 of the Supreme Court Rules.

Rule 4 repeatedly insists the record comprise only relevant material. We see in this appeal no hint of effort to cull irrelevant matter from the record. We denounce not only this casual violation of Rule 4, but also…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Griffin v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Merritt v. GrantCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Brode v. BrodeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  4. Coogler v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. SumpterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API