Janet L. Himsel, Martin Richard Himsel, Robert J. Lannon, Susan M. Lannon v. Samuel Himsel, Cory M. Himsel, Clinton S. Himsel, 4/9 Livestock, LLC, and Co-Alliance, LLP and State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Altice, Judge.
Case Summary
[1] Martin Richard Himsel, Janet L. Himsel, Robert J. Lannon, and Susan M. Lannon (collectively, the Plaintiffs) filed a complaint, alleging nuisance, negligence, and trespass, against Samuel T. Himsel, Cory M. Himsel, Clinton S. Himsel, 4/9 Livestock, LLC, and Co-Alliance, LLP (collectively, the Defendants). Specifically, the Plaintiffs alleged in their complaint that the concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO) placed on 4/9 Livestock's property in 2013 created noxious odors that are so extreme as to greatly diminish the Plaintiffs' quality of life, reduce…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Collins v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barden v. Murphy-Brown Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021
- Gordon Berg Garrison v. New Fashion Pork LLP and BWT Holdings LLPSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022
- Gordon Berg Garrison v. New Fashion Pork LLP and BWT Holdings LLPSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022
- Gordon Berg Garrison v. New Fashion Pork LLP and BWT Holdings LLPSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022
- L M Zeller v. Indiana Fire Prevention And Building SafetyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.