HTK Management, L.L.C. v. Seattle Popular Monorail Authority
Washington Supreme Court
1Dissent
¶58 J.M. Johnson, J.
(dissenting) — In a recent and highly publicized opinion, the United States Supreme Court justified its denial of federal constitutional protections against eminent domain abuse by acknowledging the states’ power to afford their citizens greater protection against such abuse.
[N]othing in our opinion precludes any State from placing further restrictions on its exercise of the takings power. Indeed, many States already impose “public use” requirements that are stricter than the federal baseline. Some of these requirements have been established as a matter of state…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Hillis v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.