Legal Opinion

Moosman v. Idaho Horse Racing Commission

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1990No. 17771, 17772PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This case involves a decision of the Idaho Horse Racing Commission to impose penalties on the owners and trainers of two race horses. On appeal the district court reversed and set aside the penalties on the ground that the rule upon which the Commission relied was unconstitutionally vague. As to the owners, we decline making a ruling on the constitutional question, because we conclude that under the Commission’s rules there was no basis to redistribute the purses. As to the trainers, we conclude, that properly interpreted the rule is not unconstitutionally vague. We also hold…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tuma v. Board of NursingIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Wyckoff v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF ADA CTY.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Pence v. Idaho State Horse Racing CommissionIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rincover v. State, Department of FinanceIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Lockhart v. Department of Fish and GameIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Fischer v. City of KetchumIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Cox v. DEPARTMENT OF INS., STATEIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Idaho Department of Law Enforcement Ex Rel. Cade v. Real Property Located Within Kootenai CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API