Legal Opinion

Haney v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 2010No. 09-CO-1100PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This case presents the question of whether administrative discipline imposed by a penal institution pursuant to its administrative process is a punishment for double jeopardy purposes such that it should preclude the government from proceeding with a criminal prosecution based upon the same conduct. Although other courts have addressed this issue, this court has not. We now specifically hold that the administrative discipline administered by the District of Columbia Department of Corrections does not bar subsequent prosecution for the same offense under the Double Jeopardy Clause.

While being…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. United States v. MayesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  3. In re W.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Porter v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  5. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. STATE OF FLORIDA v. FRANKLIN JONESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. People of Michigan v. David Omar AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. RAQUIL K. CLARK (17-09-0862, CUMBERLAND COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API