Riddick v. Mathena
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION STEVE RIDDICK, ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 7:20-cv-00449 ) v. ) ) RANDALL MATHENA, et al., ) By: Elizabeth Dillon Defendants. ) United States District Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Steve Riddick, proceeding pro se, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. There are thirteen defendants currently in the case,1 but his claims against all the defendants stem from the same basic events. Riddick alleges that defendants removed him from the “Seriously Mentally Ill/Shared Alliance Management” pod…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.