United Plumbing & Heating Co. v. AmSouth Bank
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
LEE, P.J.,
for the Court.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 1. W.D. Russum planned to build a Wee Care Child Care Center (Wee Care) in Byram, Mississippi, and selected Am-South Bank to finance the project. Rus-sum and AmSouth entered into a loan agreement in which Russum agreed to repay the funds loaned for the project and grant AmSouth the project’s deed of trust. Russum then chose United Plumbing & Heating Company, Inc. (United) to serve as the project’s general contractor. Rus- sum and United subsequently entered into agreements that acknowledged AmSouth’s limited role as lender in the project…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Palmer v. Anderson Infirmary Benevolent Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- Galloway v. Travelers Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Anglado v. Leaf River Forest Products, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- State Highway Com'n v. Patterson Enterprises Ltd.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1993
- Suddith v. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISS.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Noatex Corp. v. King Construction of Houston, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Ace Pipe Cleaning, Inc. v. Hemphill Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2014
- Bel Air Carpet v. Korey Homes Bldg GrpCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Hudson v. TravelersDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2025
- Misskelley v. Carroll CountyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.