Legal Opinion

United Plumbing & Heating Co. v. AmSouth Bank

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided July 21, 2009No. 2007-CA-01944-COAPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEE, P.J.,

for the Court.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 1. W.D. Russum planned to build a Wee Care Child Care Center (Wee Care) in Byram, Mississippi, and selected Am-South Bank to finance the project. Rus-sum and AmSouth entered into a loan agreement in which Russum agreed to repay the funds loaned for the project and grant AmSouth the project’s deed of trust. Russum then chose United Plumbing & Heating Company, Inc. (United) to serve as the project’s general contractor. Rus- sum and United subsequently entered into agreements that acknowledged AmSouth’s limited role as lender in the project…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Anderson Infirmary Benevolent Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Galloway v. Travelers Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Anglado v. Leaf River Forest Products, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State Highway Com'n v. Patterson Enterprises Ltd.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Suddith v. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISS.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Noatex Corp. v. King Construction of Houston, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  2. Ace Pipe Cleaning, Inc. v. Hemphill Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2014
  3. Bel Air Carpet v. Korey Homes Bldg GrpCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. Hudson v. TravelersDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2025
  5. Misskelley v. Carroll CountyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API