Legal Opinion

State v. Goldsberry

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided March 10, 2000No. 01-99-00890-CRPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’CONNOR, Justice.

The State appeals the trial court’s granting of a motion to quash indictment filed by Michael Dean Goldsberry, the appellee. We reverse.

Procedural Background

The State charged the appellee with the offense of abuse of official capacity. The appellee filed two motions to quash. One motion raised the argument that the indictment did not give the appellee adequate notice of the charged offense. The second motion raised the argument that Section 39.02(a)(2) of the Penal Code is unconstitutional on its face.

The parties presented arguments on both motions at a pretrial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. State v. MaysCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. Flores v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  3. Galliford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  4. Manning v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  5. State v. York, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API