Legal Opinion
Grocery Supply, Inc. v. McKinley Park Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided March 7, 1955No. Nos. A-10106, A-10200, A-9444PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLTA, District Judge.
The questions presented stem from the motions of the receiver in Suntrana Mining Co., Inc., v. McKinley Park Services, Inc., to set aside the entry of default in Grocery Supply, Inc. v. McKinley Park Services, Inc., and to consolidate these cases with the Chace Photo Enterprises case. For the purpose of argument these cases were treated as consolidated.
I am of the opinion that the right to consolidate turns on whether the entry of default may be set aside at the instance of the receiver.
The facts bearing on the default aspect of the problem may be summarized as follows:…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pendleton v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Duryee v. GraySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
- The GreyhoundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Reed v. Alaska Mines Corp.District Court, D. Alaska · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lankenau v. Coggeshall & HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- John C. Lankenau, Esq., as Receiver of Lester D. Brown, D/B/A L. D. Brown Co. v. Coggeshall & Hicks, Applicant-Appellee. This Case Came Up on Appeal Under the Style SEC v. Brown, That Used in the District Court. Upon Request, However, the Case on Appeal Has Been Renamed, as Indicated. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lester D. Brown, D/B/A L. D. Brown Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965