Legal Opinion

In re Contempt of Dorsey

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 9, 2014No. Docket No. 309269PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Kelly Michelle Dorsey, appeals by right the contempt order entered by the Livingston Circuit Court, Family Division (the family court). As part of her son’s juvenile adjudication, the family court entered an order requiring appellant to submit to random drug screens at the request of the probation department. The court found appellant in criminal contempt after she refused to comply with the order, and she was sentenced to 93 days in jail and ordered to pay $200 in costs, $120 in attorney’s fees, and $500 in fines. We affirm.

I. BASIC FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The criminal…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. People v. CarinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. City of Indianapolis v. EdmondSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. O’connell v. Director of ElectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. D’alessandro Contracting Group, LLC v. WrightMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Brody v. Deutchman (In Re Rhea Brody Living Trust)Michigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Five Brothers Mortgage Company v. the McCue Mortgage CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. In re Contempt of DorseyMichigan Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API