Legal Opinion

Brigham v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1905No. Civ. No. 100PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, refusing a new trial. Curtis D. Wilbur, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGray, P. J.

The plaintiff had a verdict for damages in the sum of $2,000 for having been wrongfully ejected from defendant’s train. On defendant’s motion for a new trial, the damages were reduced to $1,000, and on acceptance by plaintiff the new trial was denied. The appeal is by defendant from the order denying a new trial.

The plaintiff in his complaint says that for a long time prior to his injury he had been engaged in mining, mercantile, and brokerage business. Prom his testimony it appears that he was a “traveling man” by occupation, and had, a little less than three months previous to his alleged…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morse v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. CannonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ingham v. Luxor Cab Co.California Court of Appeal · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API