Legal Opinion

Faircloth v. . Johnson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 8, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVaesee, J.

The charge of the trial court is to be sustained if, upon any view of the evidence taken in its most favorable light for the defendant, but yet found to be true in its entirety, it supports the verdict.

In order to constitute a valid cancellation under subsection 2 of C. S., 2594, on 13 September, 1913, the “endorsement of payment and satisfaction appearing thereon (on the mortgage and note) by the payee, mortgagee, trustee, or assignee of the same, or by any chartered active banking institution in the State of North Carolina,” contemplates clearly that such payee or mortgagee must be sui…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. MacGreal v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Fortune v. . HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Baggett v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Buchanan v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Helms v. . AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Cannon v. . BlairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Bobby Floars Toyota, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Watson v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API