Legal Opinion
Lee Myles Associates Corp. v. Abrams
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 8, 1982PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Norman C. Ryp, J.
A. ISSUES
Whether, and, if so to what extent a “professional” franchiser entitled to procedural due process under the 1981 Franchise Sales Act (General Business Law, art 33). Does this statutory interpretation of first impression require this neutral court to drive with or reverse the parked franchises of a well-known transmission company?
Lee Myles Associates Corporation (Lee Myles) and Charles George (George), in this CPLR article 78 petition, seek an order vacating the determination dated June 10, 1982 of respondent, Attorney-General of the State of New…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mon-Shore Management, Inc. v. Family Media, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984