Legal Opinion

O. V. Dodge & Co. v. Livingston

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Eh’ror from Barton District Court. The opinion states the nature of the action, and the material facts. Judgment for plaintiffs Child & Livingston, for $295.90 and costs. The defendants O. V. Dodge & Co. bring the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

This proceeding is brought to reverse a judgment obtained by Childs & Livingston, in the district court of Barton county, on the 19th day of February, 1885. It appears that Childs & Livingston purchased a pump from Dodge & Co., who were to put it in a drill-well about 230 feet deep, upon the premises of Childs & Livingston, in a good and workmanlike manner, and so that it would operate satisfactorily. Dodge & Co. sent one of their agents, named Mulks, to put in the pump. He proceeded to do so, with the assistance of Livingston, and in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Luby v. . the Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Bellefontaine Railway Co. v. HunterIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. FraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1886

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Walker v. O'ConnellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  3. Cherokee & Pittsburg Coal & Mining Co. v. DicksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  4. Robins Mining Co. v. MurdockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  5. Stecher v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API