Legal Opinion

Piper v. May

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1875PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Erom the Carroll Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

Suit for partition of land by the appellant, who was the widow of Philip May, deceased, against the appellees; children of said deceased. The deceased owned *284eighty-eight and three-tenths acres of land, which at his death descended to the widow and children. They after-wards purchased thirty acres more of land, she paying one-third of the price, and the children, by their guardian, two-thirds thereof. The widow, in March, 1870, intermarried with Piper. Afterwards, in April, 1872, this action was commenced. It was found and reported by the commissioners appointed that the land could not be…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Avery v. AkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. McGill v. McGillSupreme Court of Florida · 1882
  3. Lytle v. HulenOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Nesbitt v. TrindleIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Forgy v. DavenportIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API