Daniels v. City of New London
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Shit to set aside an award and for an injunction; brought to the Superior Court in New London County and heard before Fenn, J. Facts found and judgment rendered for the defendant, and appeal by the plaintiffs. The case is fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtTorrance, J.
On the 27th of August, 1887, a controversy between the plaintiffs and defendant concerning the amount and validity of certain sewer assessments, was pending before a judge of the Superior Court under the statute, and on that day the parties agreed to submit the matters in controversy to arbitration. The judge before whom the matter was pending was made at first the sole arbitrator, but another judge was afterwards by agreement associated with him.
*168The written, submission provided, among other things, that the arbitrators in hearing and determining the controversy and in taxing costs should be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Holker v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Bowyer v. SeymourWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1878
- Scarborough v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beliveau v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
- Louis Michel, Inc. v. Whitecourt Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Blum v. EdenbornLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1920